If you listen to the
broadcast media, you will have almost certainly picked up the message
that at some point in the near future the Chancellor is going to have
to raise taxes or cut spending to ‘pay for’ all the support to
the economy during the pandemic. At least the Financial Times has
learnt the lesson of 2010, and notes
in this editorial that the Chancellor
“must hold the line and resist attempts to push the UK into a premature fiscal retrenchment. Cutting spending in the middle of the worst recession since the creation of the country would be a historic blunder and make Britain poorer in the long run through unnecessary unemployment and business failure.”
If only they had
said the same in 2010.
But they add
“Eventually the bill for the crisis-fighting measures will come
due.” This is also the message of the latest report
from the OBR. We can see what they have in mind from this chart.
The upper dotted
line is the OBR's worst case scenario. Next one down is the central
scenario, followed by another dotted line which is their best case
scenario. The other lines are previous forecasts.
All the scenarios,
including previous pre-pandemic forecasts, show the same underlying
instability. The difference is that as a result of the pandemic, this
instability kicks in around the end of this decade rather than
sometime in the next decade. Here we get to the crucial point I want
to make. For the next five years, in its central forecast public debt
moves either side of its projected level for 2020/1 of 104% of GDP. (For
each year thereafter: 104, 105, 106, 102.)
The implication is
that there is no immediate need for large scale fiscal tightening when the
economy recovers. The deficit will be higher than we are used to, but
with a higher level of public debt and very low interest rates the
level of the deficit that stabilises this debt is also higher. Thus
there is no immediate need for substantial tax increases or spending cuts
immediately after the recovery is complete. According to the OBR
something will need to be done after the general election, but I
doubt any Conservative Chancellor will raise taxes substantially ahead of a general
election based on OBR forecasts alone.
So the big news from
the OBR’s report is not only that there is no immediate need for fiscal consolidation, but if the economy recovers according to its
central scenario and it has got its fiscal numbers right, there is no
need for substantial fiscal consolidation once the recovery is over. A permanent
hit to UK output, which in other circumstances would lead to an
unsustainable deficit, has been offset by the impact of low borrowing
costs and a higher level of debt. Of course the OBR may turn out to have been too optimistic, and their pessimistic scenario does show
debt rising through debt rising a bit between 2020/1 and 2024/5.
So why all the talk
of fiscal gloom? (Not quite all. Ben Chu at the Independent has made
the points I make above.) Are they reflecting what the OBR says? The
report is called the “Fiscal Sustainability Report”, so you would
expect them to flag the long term instability. But the final
paragraph in their summary ends with this:
“in almost any conceivable world there would be a need at some point to raise tax revenues and/or reduce spending (as a share of national income) to put the public finances on a sustainable path.”
It seems that too
many ignored the crucial three words “at some point”.
All this illustrates
how deep seated the “deficit up = taxes will rise or spending will
be cut” meme is. Of all the important economic stories that arise
from this stage in the pandemic, the consequences for the deficit and
future consolidation is not one of them. I guess one reason these stories are
popular is that they are potentially relevant to everyone. Another is
that they are so easy to write. Let us just hope that this time
around politicians on all sides are not taking them seriously.
Posting may not happen for two or
three weeks, because we are finally moving house..
No comments:
Post a Comment
Unfortunately because of spam with embedded links (which then flag up warnings about the whole site on some browsers), I have to personally moderate all comments. As a result, your comment may not appear for some time. In addition, I cannot publish comments with links to websites because it takes too much time to check whether these sites are legitimate.