I have finally got
around to reading this excellent CEPR ebook
on Germany’s exceptional recovery. That German GDP growth since the
Global Financial Crisis (GFC) is higher than average Eurozone growth
or French growth can be seen below.
GDP growth (source
OECD Economic Outlook)
However the relative
performance in terms of unemployment is remarkable.
Unemployment
(national definitions, source OECD Economic Outlook)
The tremendous
success in reducing unemployment is discussed in two papers in the
book, and both suggest that it had more to do with changes in the
nature of firm-union bargaining than the Hartz reforms. (John Springford has a nice chart showing how the German Phillips curve has shifted.) I have for
some time noted how wage increases in Germany after 2000 were too low
in the context of a 2% inflation target, and this helped drive an
export boom and is a factor behind a huge current account surplus of
8% of GDP.
Other chapters in
the ebook argue that there were other, perhaps as or more
important, factors behind this export boom, and I’m convinced that
other factors did play a role. However the point I want to make in
this post is that, as long as these factors are permanent, they imply
that the real exchange rate in Germany has to rise at some point.
This is exactly the same point as saying that not all of the German current
account surplus of 8% is structural. Some of that surplus is because
the German real exchange rate is undervalued.
There are two ways
the German real exchange rate can appreciate. The first is via an
appreciation in the Euro, and the second is for German inflation to
be higher than average Euro area inflation. Below is a chart of one
measure of competitiveness for both Germany and the Euro area.
The level is
arbitrary: it is how the two series move over time and relative to
each other that matters. You can see how Germany gained
competitiveness.over other Eurozone countries from 2000 to the GFC.
You can also see how that gain has been partially but not fully
unwound over the last 7 or 8 years. Looking at Euro area
competitiveness, it is a little below its average level over the past
and also its level in 2010 when I calculated it was close to its
equilibrium rate to the dollar. (This work was unpublished, but uses
a similar model to the one I used to calculate the optimal entry rate
of Sterling into the Euro as part of the 5 tests.)
So there is perhaps
some scope for a further appreciation in the Euro, but it seems unlikely that will be enough on its own to achieve the required German real appreciation. German nominal wages have increased by more than the Euro average in recent years, but the differences have been small. That difference needs to increase to get Germany's real exchange rate to sustainable levels. Germany should not think of that as a problem,
but rather the way their export success has to be translated into
higher incomes for German workers..
One million immigrants?
ReplyDeleteI think the interesting question to ask is why have German unions been able to suppress wages in the short (/mid?) term to drive German competitiveness to a level that led to tremendous wealth and jobs growth over the longer term, whereas British Unions have always simply demanded a pay rise with the opposite result.
ReplyDeleteOne theory I've heard is that many German towns are dominated by a single employer, so the focus on preserving jobs is more acute than the short term demand for more wages. I've never seen any evidence, though.
If you compare unemployment in France as against Germany and the UK, you find that there is a major difference in the levels of short term employment, which in France is regarded as "precarious", undesirable and is discouraged. This is not the case in Germany and the UK. Adjust for this and you have the explanation for the persistenly high level in France.
ReplyDeleteGiven that the Euro involves countries with economies that are not as advanced as Germany, what are the implications for the PIGS, Poland Latvia etc of any exchange rate change to mitigate inflation in Germany ? Are they likely to align with the macro needs of these other nations? If not how can the Troika best destroy these other nations?
ReplyDelete