It used to be the
case that a Prime Minister that had deliberately shut down parliament
against its will might have felt sufficiently ashamed that they would
have resigned when the courts found against them. It certainly would
have been true for most of my lifetime that they would have shown
some contrition when the verdict became clear. If you ask me to prove
those claims of course I cannot, because no previous PM would have
even thought it permissible to shut down parliament against its will.
But since WWII many senior politicians have resigned when they made a
mistake of this magnitude. But Johnson is a Prime Minister like none
before him, as Steve Richards shows
with authority.
If instead they had
appeared unapologetic and kept insisting they were right, political
parties in the past would have shown much disquiet over what had
happened. Yet on Wednesday we saw the massed ranks of Conservative
MPs cheering as the Prime Minister declared he thought he had done nothing
wrong. He says he has respect for the law, but what respect is he
giving it if he simply asserts all supreme court judges unanimously
misunderstood the constitution. This is no criminal claiming his
innocence as he is taken down to the cells, but a Prime Minister
telling all 11 supreme court judges that he knows the law better than
they do.
If you read the
judgement of the supreme court it is obvious that they are correct
and are acting as the ultimate upholders of the constitution.
Parliament is supreme, and cannot be shut down against its will for
the convenience of the executive. As they note, the government didn’t
even offer any explanation of why they felt it necessary to prorogue
parliament for 5 weeks when preparation for a Queen’s Speech
normally takes 5 days. What they did claim is that it had nothing to
do with their own political interest, yet the PM and his allies had
the cheek to infer that the judges had decided for political reasons
to do with Brexit. Of course that claim was a huge political tell,
because that was exactly the motivation for them shutting down
parliament.
What this case shows
is that good government in this country relies on the executive
acting within the constitution and obeying the law. This government
is so dangerous because it seeks at every turn to ignore the
constitution and use its power for its own ends, in the full
knowledge that their actions will be challenged in the courts. So the
PM says we will be leaving come what may on 31st October, despite an
Act of Parliament telling him he must ask for an extension. He knows
he will be breaking the law, but just as parliament will not get its
lost days back, perhaps the UK will have crashed out of the EU before
the courts make him follow the law.
Then there is
language. Words like betrayal and surrender, once the preserve of the
Brexit press, have now become the words
of our Prime Minister. Words are chosen for their emotive effect
alone: how can postponing the date we leave the EU be described as
surrender. It is the most obvious manifestation of something that
should be clear to everyone: Johnson is acting like Trump and
employing the tactics of Trump quite deliberately. It is the language
that violent thugs on the right happily repeat, and directly leads
to a rise in hate crimes on our streets. It is the language and
tactics of someone who wants to brush aside all checks on their
absolute power, the language and tactics of an elected dictator.
One MP has already
been murdered, and a plot by right wing thugs to murder another was
foiled. Yet the response of the Prime Minister and his chief
aide to concern about death threats from any MP that dares to oppose
their policies is that they should do what the Prime Minister asks
and the threats would end. Like many dictators they effectively use
violence and threats of violence to help their cause..
The lesson we cannot
avoid drawing is that this government has become dangerously rogue,
and the party from which it comes is no better. People are no longer
safe with it in charge. In the past, at least the press would have
held the government to account, but now it eggs it on. A BBC that
also might have told inconvenient facts has been threatened into
submission. A rogue government is a big enough problem, but one that
can control large parts of the media is able to pretend it represents
the people versus the establishment.
All Johnson’s
actions and provocations have one aim. He aims to pretend at the
forthcoming general election that he alone is fighting for the people
against an establishment of parliament, the judges and the EU that
are combining to block the people’s will. Apparently calling an act
of parliament a surrender bill polls well. He hopes the combination
of a FPTP system and a divided opposition will mean he can win an
election even though he commands the support of a minority of the
British people. To this end the press that is his propaganda arm have
attempted to demonise the leader of the main opposition so that too
many say they could not possibly vote for him.
The real threat to
this country today is not someone who champions Jewish causes outside
Israel, or someone who sees that our current economic system is
failing too many. The real threat lies in far right thugs and a
government that wants to destroy our pluralist democracy. The only
way we have to stop a Prime Minister whose over the top language is
used in death threats to MPs, and who describes those who ask him to
be careful as talking humbug, is to remove him from power.
We can only have one
of two Prime Ministers in 2020. It is essential for those who want to
protect our pluralist democracy to ensure they vote tactically to
remove the Prime Minister who threatens that democracy. If anyone
believes our current Prime Minister will change his ways if he is in
charge of a minority government just needs to watch him now. People
tell me negative messages do not win elections. Preserving a
pluralist democracy and not inciting far right violence surely
promotes the positive messages of mutual respect, democracy rather than dictatorship, and for our MPs and others to work in peace rather than fearing the next violent attack. When a Prime Minster responds to the fears of MPs over death threats encouraged by his language by saying humbug, it is time for him to be removed.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Unfortunately because of spam with embedded links (which then flag up warnings about the whole site on some browsers), I have to personally moderate all comments. As a result, your comment may not appear for some time. In addition, I cannot publish comments with links to websites because it takes too much time to check whether these sites are legitimate.