The
language of the latest IMF report on the Eurozone could not be clearer.
“The euro area crisis has reached a new and critical stage.
Despite major policy actions, financial markets in parts of the region remain
under acute stress, raising questions about the viability of the monetary union
itself. The adverse links between sovereigns, banks, and the real economy are
stronger than ever. As a consequence, financial markets are increasingly
fragmenting along national borders, demand is weakening, inflation pressures are
subsiding, and unemployment is increasing. A further intensification of the
crisis would have a substantial impact on neighboring European countries and
the rest of the world.”
The
Fund says that “A more determined and forceful collective response is needed.” The
report contains many proposals for action. For example “the first priority is a
banking union for the euro area”. But the proposals that I want to highlight
are those for the ECB. They include a call for further interest rate
reductions.
“Economic
weakness and downside risks to inflation in the euro area warrant further
reductions in the main policy rates. Although the room for such reductions is limited,
they would deliver a strong signaling effect and, in addition, provide some direct
near-term support to weaker banks by reducing indexed borrowing costs under
existing LTROs.”
In addition,
the report suggests Quantitative Easing.
“The ECB
could achieve further monetary easing through a transparent QE program
encompassing sizable sovereign bond purchases, possibly preannounced over a
given period of time. Buying a representative portfolio of long-term government
bonds—e.g., defined equitably across the euro area by GDP weights—would also
provide a measure of added stability to stressed sovereign markets. However, QE
would likely also contribute to lower yields in already “low yield” countries,
including Germany.”
At first
sight this uniform application of bond purchases seems odd, but the report also
suggests
“Additional
and clearly communicated SMP purchases could ensure the transmission of
monetary easing where sovereign bond markets are subject to increased stress.”
Until now such a policy has looked too much like fiscal dominance to
the ECB: bailing out irresponsible governments. But as the IMF show clearly
with this chart, such action can simply be justified as part of its monetary policy
operations.
Not only are
high interest rates on government debt in Greece, Ireland, Portugal, Spain
and Italy producing fiscal austerity, but they are leading to a much tighter
monetary policy in those countries. QE can be justified as a means of reversing
this completely counterproductive (given the degree of fiscal austerity already
implemented) monetary contraction. The idea that ECB bond purchases
would induce problems of moral hazard in the periphery countries is absurd.
These countries, as the IMF report points out, are already tightening their
fiscal policy substantially: deficits are being cut much more rapidly than they
should be from a macroeconomic point of view.
“The pace of
fiscal adjustment is particularly accelerated in the hard-hit periphery
countries: the projected consolidation over this and next year ranges from
around 3½ percentage points or more of GDP in
Portugal, Greece, Italy, and Spain, compared with ½ percentage point or less in
Germany, Austria, and Finland”
In this
context, to worry that QE type operations directed at periphery bond markets
would induce moral hazard or indicate some kind of loss of ECB independence or
fiscal dominance is ridiculous.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Unfortunately because of spam with embedded links (which then flag up warnings about the whole site on some browsers), I have to personally moderate all comments. As a result, your comment may not appear for some time. In addition, I cannot publish comments with links to websites because it takes too much time to check whether these sites are legitimate.