Brexit
could be a gift to Labour that will keep on giving, if the Labour
leader is able to grasp it
One
of the sentences you are sure to hear nowadays is: “Brexit is not
going to go away anytime soon”. It is true because Conservative
party members will not let it go away. A recent poll
showed a majority of those who will elect our next Prime Minister
would prefer achieving Brexit to Scotland saying in the UK, Northern
Ireland staying in the UK, or even the survival of their own party.
They want Brexit even if it causes severe damage to the economy. The
only thing that the poll suggested might make a majority forsake
Brexit is the prospect of Jeremy Corbyn becoming Prime
Minister.Therein lies the cure for our current Brexit blight and the
opportunity for more than one period of Labour government.
In
the short term Brexit fanaticism is extremely scary. The wish to see
Brexit happen even if it leads to the destruction of the Tory party
is utterly extraordinary coming from Conservative party members. Of
course Conservative MPs do not want to see that, but their survival
in government now seems tied to getting Brexit done, and so most seem
prepared to contemplate a No Deal Brexit if that is what it takes.
Our only hope to prevent this are a small band of Tory MPs who might
put country before party, who could then combine with most opposition
MPs to stop this happening.
Even
if the attempt to leave with No Deal in October fails or does not
happen, the Tory party is not going to give up. This radicalised
membership will do its work by selecting Brexiters when MPs retire or
leave for other reasons, and they may well deselect some of those who
oppose No Deal. At some point those willing to stand up in parliament
against a No Deal Brexit on the Tory benches will shrink to become
insignificant. At that point Conservative party members will get
their prize, if they are still in government.
How
did the Conservative party descend to this level of fanaticism about
just one issue? Robert Saunders’s New Statesman article
about the closing of the Conservative mind is well worth reading. It
is particularly useful for those young enough to think that
Conservatives were always neoliberals. He writes:
“For most of its history, the Conservative Party has embraced ideas, while disclaiming ideology. Yet today, a party enslaved by ideology is almost barren of thought, just as it faces a historic set of challenges.”
Sauders has some ideas about why this happened but I think it remains
a puzzle. One possibility is simply the scale of their intellectual
victory under Thatcher, such that their Labour opponents showed they
could operate in the UK that Thatcher bequeathed but with a more
human face (including more NHS spending). The Conservatives became,
to use Theresa May’s words,
the nasty party in voters minds. The only way forward was to double
down on reactionary xenophobia (Hague’s “foreign land”) or
ramp up the neoliberalism (Osborne's austerity).
How
did the Tory party membership get so radicalised about Brexit, when
all the talk was about radicalism and entryism in the Labour party?
The reason is that the Tory press that spent so much ink on talking
about an imagined hard left Labour membership was also busy
radicalising the Conservatives. Brexit embodies a mixture of
nationalism, xenophobia, nostalgia and neoliberal zeal that
Conservative party members cannot resist.
In
all this scary stuff there is a potential light at the end of the
tunnel, a way out of all this mess. And despite all the talk, it
isn’t a Remain victory in a People's Vote. Even if we have another
referendum, which seems only likely in a last minute panic created by
an EU ultimatum, it will not de-radicalise the Tory membership. If,
as seems prudent, the referendum is about the withdrawal agreement,
then Brexiters will say that the right question was not asked. If it
involves No Deal, then any loss by a few percentage points (and the
press will ensure at least that) will just become unfinished
business.
The
best way for Brexit to end is not in the drama of another referendum,
but instead with a whimper. The only way that can happen, with a
radicalised Tory membership, is by electing a Labour government. As I
have argued with little challenge, the Tories would oppose any sort
of softer Brexit a Labour government might propose, so together with
Remainers they would have a blocking majority in parliament or the
country. How far a Corbyn led government would go down this road to
nowhere we do not know. But he would never be allowed to put a Labour
government at risk by pursuing a lost cause, so Brexit will not
happen as long as a Labour government remained in power..
What
we know a future Labour government would do is undertake a lot of
measures designed to help one section of the Brexit electorate, the
so called left behind. Very soon those and other voters would lose
interest in Brexit, as politics became all about what the Labour
government was actually doing. People would increasingly look back at
the years following the 2016 referendum as wasted years, and an
example of something never to be repeated.
At
first Conservatives would try and keep the flame of Brexit alive.
Doing so would only ensure their unelectability, as Labour would only
have to remind people of the chaos of the Brexit years. Conservative
voters and MPs would gradually realise that being the Brexit party
was like being the nasty party, a sure way not to be re-elected. It
may take one or two more elections, but as that poll of Conservative
party members suggested, the only thing that could make them give up
Brexit is a Corbyn government. That is in essence why a Labour
government is the best, and I suspect only, way of disposing of the
Brexit blight that has infected the Conservative party and therefore
the UK.
This
is the light at the end of the tunnel, such that Brexit ends with a
whimper. However you have perhaps already wondered why, if this is
all true, so many Labour voters and Remain supporters chose not to
vote Labour in the European elections? Why have the Liberal Democrats
suddenly managed to break free of the shackles of being in the 2010
Coalition government to be among the four contender parties in
opinion polls?
I
think there are two answers, one that acted as a trigger and one
underlying force. The trigger was the Brexit talks between Corbyn and
May. Although political commentators rightly gave these talks little
hope of success, their length would certainly have provoked a fear
among Remainers who had voted Labour in 2017 that Brexit could happen
in this way. In addition the European poll seemed like an appropriate
time to protest.
The
underlying factor is that many voters are now identifying
themselves in political terms along a Remain/Leave divide instead of
a political divide. Remainers were getting fed up with the absence of
a strong political voice making the case for Remain, and instead
hearing endless discussion of impossible Brexit plans from the ERG.
All they hear from Labour (because most voters do not read political
speeches) is the latest version of Labour’s position on a second
referendum. Labour seems to be muffling
its own voice on the issue of the moment.
The Liberal Democrat campaign slogan
of ‘Bollocks to Brexit’ was just want Remainers had been waiting
to hear.
Which
brings us to the current shadow cabinet meetings. Corbyn has moved
another iota, agreeing
that an option on the ballot would be “a real choice” for
Remainers, but not moving nearly as far as many want. There is a
certain symmetry in the two main parties position on Brexit, but also
major differences. The symmetry is that, during May’s period, both
parties wanted some form of compromise compared to what most of their
party members wanted. Both parties eventually encouraged an insurgent
party, the Brexit party for the Tories and the Liberal Democrats for
Labour, that was able to take a large number of their votes by
offering policies that forsaked compromise. But there the similarity
ends.
The
Conservative party will decide, in one way or another, to come to
some kind of accommodation with the insurgent party. That will happen
by changing their Brexit policy to mirror the policy of the
insurgent, or to cooperate with the insurgent party in any general
election, or both. The Conservatives, as they always do, will adapt
to the threat they face in order to stay in power. .
The
Labour leadership, in contrast, is in denial. All the evidence points
to their failure to campaign for Remain as being a critical threat to
an election victory, an election that could come very soon. Even
before the European elections there were as many Remain and Leave
maginals, because many working class Labour voters had changed their
mind since 2016. In addition, it turns out Labour leavers do not feel
that strongly
about Labour taking a Remain position, but Labour Remainers care
about it a lot. I have not come across a single reputable pollster
that suggests Labour are increasing their General Election chances by
keeping its pro-Brexit position, and plenty arguing
that to win they have to back Remain.
The
argument that Labour needs to support Brexit to win the election is
no longer credible. Instead the leadership’s support for Brexit
puts at serious risk a Labour government that could rule for more
than a decade. When you add in the impossibility of a Labour
government enacting Brexit, and I just do not see why Lexiters remain
in denial.
Incremental
moves until conference also makes no sense as a strategy. The longer
Remain voters get used to thinking they are going to vote Green or
Liberal Democrat, and as long as the Labour leadership resists what
appears to be overwhelming force, there is a strong risk that many
will carry that habit into a General Election, if only because
Labour’s eventual change will lack credibility.
If
the shadow cabinet are interested in maximising Labour’s chance of
being in power, it has to change Labour’s official position to one
of supporting Remain now. No one is asking Corbyn himself
to campaign for Remain, and it would probably be better if he didn’t,
because there are plenty on his front bench who can do so more
credibly. But their campaigning has to reflect Labour’s official
position, which is to become the only party that can make Brexit go
away.
6 weeks without comments! Come on, Simon!
ReplyDeleteThe Age of Consensus from 1945 to 1979 saw socialism drive back Conservatism, which reversed in the Age of Aspiration since 1979. The Conservative Party has always been ideological.
ReplyDeleteCorbyn needs all Labour MPs to vote against the government in a vote of confidence, which some may not if he promised a second referendum now, but if a general election has been called then the Labour Party can put Remain in its manifesto.
"At first Conservatives would try and keep the flame of Brexit alive. Doing so would only ensure their unelectability, as Labour would only have to remind people of the chaos of the Brexit years."
ReplyDeleteI find this suggestion hopelessly optimistic. You know as well as anyone that the Labour Party, especially when it has a leader from the (relative) left wing, has NO control over public narratives at all. The media will simply keep that message as quiet as it can.
Could you see the Libdems entering a coalition with Labour if Labour do not back Remain unequivocally? At least then Corbyn can acquiesce to remaining without actively campaigning for it. I have to say that's the way I see things going. Hopefully. I simply don't see enough Tories voting Labour even if they do back Remain, the Libdems will hoover those votes up.
ReplyDeleteWhere have all the comments gone, and why do mine not appear, am I the only one left commenting on your blogs?
ReplyDelete“Very soon those and other voters would lose interest in Brexit, as politics became all about what the Labour government was actually doing.”
ReplyDeleteCloud cuckoo land as inhabited by the Elite!
We are no longer a democratic country. We will not become a democratic country until the whole system falls apart. Thank God for Jeremy Corbyn, I have every faith that he can reduce the country to a necessary state of despair.
“Corbyn has moved another iota, agreeing that an option on the ballot would be “a real choice” for Remainers.”
ReplyDeleteFor someone who critical of media reporting, this is a very selective interpretation of Corbyn said.
What Corbyn actually said was
“A ballot paper would need to contain real choices for both leave and remain voters.”
Hopefully, this means a People’s vote rather than a Confirmatory vote including an option for full EU membership including the Euro and Schengen and an option for full No Deal Exit. Unfortunately, many people wish to see a vote between options which leave us half in the EU or half out, where, in either case, we would just be subservient recipients of EU decision making.
Scotland had a recent referendum, on whether to leave the UK, a 300 year old arrangement, or stay.
ReplyDeleteImagine that they had voted leave. But the politicians didn’t implement it. We need a second referendum. The people didn’t realize what they were voting for. The lies! Etc.
Would the good people be asking why the "leavers" were so fanatical? Determined to implement this crazy idea, regardless of the consequences?
I suggest not. And that is the key to understanding the commentary around this current situation.
Possibly not popular at this blog, but I look forward to the responses.