The Tory party
has lost its battle with reality. But there remains one hope, a man
with a joke and a smile that can set the UK free from the EU.
Unfortunately to do that he may set the UK free from democracy as we
know it.
For those not
familiar with the film Matrix, there is a scene
where the hero Neo encounters a boy bending a spoon with his mind.
The boy hands the spoon to Neo. The dialog goes on:
Spoon
boy: Do not try and bend the spoon. That's impossible. Instead...
only try to realize the truth.
Neo:
What truth?
Spoon
boy: There is no spoon.
Neo:
There is no spoon?
Spoon
boy: Then you'll see that it is not the spoon that bends, it is only
yourself.
Neo
then appears to bend the spoon with
his mind.
In the film the spoon isn’t real, but a digital simulation fed to
unconscious humans to keep them alive. But what would happen in
the real world if
you really, really wanted to bend that spoon, and
there was another world where you could make that happen?
You
could get to
that world by talking a blue pill offered to you by a kind of
anti-Neo.
Welcome
to the contest for our next Prime Minister, where the electorate is
just a small group of party members and Conservative MPs. The current
contest is all about Brexit. Brexit is stuck. The goal of Brexiters,
taken up by many (but definitely not all) who voted for it, is to
gain complete independence from the EU and all its rules and
regulations. They hoped to do this by leaving the Single Market and
Customs Union, and replacing them with a free trade agreement (FTA)
with the EU. Unfortunately they brushed
aside
two obstacles: the Irish border and the Good Friday Agreement.
Together
they are
a
spoon that
so many Conservatives want to bend by
wishing it so.
The Irish government and the EU live in the real world, so they know
that an FTA with the EU would require a hard border on the island of
Ireland. A hard border is incompatible with the Good Friday
Agreement. As a result, either Northern Ireland or the UK has to keep
their
trading rules such that there cannot be a hard border in Ireland. The
backstop
ensures this will happen.
Complete independence for the UK from the EU is therefore
impossible,
just
like
bending a spoon by
thought alone.
Most
Conservative candidates for Prime Minister pretend they can really
bend the spoon. Many suggest it can be bent using soon to be invented
technology. Technology that would make a hard border anywhere near
the actual border unnecessary. But these candidates have a problem.
If such technology could be found, the EU have
said they would
be happy to apply it. And if such technology is just around the
corner, why would the Brexiters object to the backstop that will soon
be removed? The fact that the same Brexiters who say the technology
is almost
apon us
also refuse to accept the backstop suggests they do not really
believe in
bending
spoons.
One
or two candidates say that, if only they are given a chance to stare
into the whites of the EU negotiators eyes, they can make the EU
bend. This is also impossible. Others suggest that we can leave in
October with No Deal and then we can do the FTA we want, because the
EU will want the £39 billion that we have already agreed we owe
them. In reality if we break our existing agreements with the EU
after
a No Deal Brexit the
EU
can do things like fail to let our airplanes fly.
Many
of those voting for our next Prime Minister may
understand all this deep
down.
They agree with the spoon boy that you cannot bend a spoon by
thought alone.
Instead
they
want to take the blue
pill,
and
go to a world where almost anything is possible if you want it
enough.
A
world where you can wish away the Irish border problem. The same
world where
we once
stood
alone and won
WWII all
by ourselves.
These
Conservative
party members are not hanging on every detail of alternative
arrangements for the Irish border to check that they will actually
work. They don’t mind too much how we leave and what is done to
parliament to make that happen. They just want their blue
pill and their anti-Neo
to make all their difficulties disappear. They want someone
to
get Brexit done and banish Farage and then diminish Corbyn so they
might actually win another
election. They want there to be no spoon, because life would be too
difficult if today’s reality turned out to be all there is.
In particular, and to mix imaginary tales horribly, if they
recognised reality they would have to give up their precious,
Brexit.
Just
after the 2017 general election I wrote
about the Zugzwang that the Conservative party found itself in.
Zugzwang is a term in chess where a player finds
themselves
in a position where
every
move that it is possible to make ends up making them worse off. In
that situation the chess player would like to skip their move, but
the rules say they cannot. What I had in mind then was that most Tory
MPs
wanted to be rid of May because she was clearly a hopeless leader who
had called an unnecessary election with a commanding lead in the
polls and lost it all. Yet these same MPs could not get rid of May
because they would get a Brexiter instead.
I
underestimated the Zugzwang the Conservatives
were in. I hadn’t realised the depth of the rabbit hole that
Brexiters were prepared to take the Conservative party and its
members. Brexit could have happened if the Brexiters had not voted
against May’s deal. Instead they have taken a referendum that
promised the easiest trade deal with the EU in history and pretended
it is mandate for No Deal at all. Their supporters in the press egg
them on and most in the broadcast media let this pass.
At
the
bottom of the rabbit hole of Brexit, where only complete independence
for the EU is acceptable, you
can only survive by
taking the blue
pill.
The blue
pill
takes you to another place where most Conservative members and MPs
want to live. And Boris Johnson, who can seemingly make any bullets
fired at him stop
dead in mid
air
with a joke and a smile, is the person
who
can make this happen. Boris
Johnson will offer you a red pill and a blue pill. The red pill that
is reality and the blue pill where thought can bend spoons. Pills
like the two articles
he wrote before he decided to champion Brexit.
Unfortunately
that other place where
you go if you take the blue pill is
not fictitious. They have seen it across the Atlantic. Johnson is in
reality their Trump. Trump can get away with so many things that once
were considered
outrageous, and he only gets away with it because he has a party
machine and
media behind
him that is prepared to tolerate and
justify anything
Trump
does so they can stay
in power, as long as the party serves its backers’ interests. A UK
version of Trump is the only way of delivering an outrageous thing
like No Deal Brexit.
Johnson,
like Trump, is criticised for his lies and personal behaviour
but he just laughs it off and nothing seems to matter. There are
much more worrying similarities
between the two. Johnson, like Trump, cannot concentrate
for long, says or does
the wrong
thing
at critical moments, has no vision except his own advancement, and
makes serious mistakes that go beyond
his words and his personal life. His genius is to turn his own
incompetence into a joke, so he appears so refreshing compared to
most politicians. Although the jokes may be well rehearsed,
the incompetence is real. When you are worse
off
because of his incompetence it isn’t funny anymore, but you just
need enough people who are yet to experience his incompetence first
hand and who appreciate a funny politician and the job is done.
Which
leads to a critical realisation. If Johnson is the UK’s Trump, then
the spoon is not just the Irish border, or the consequences of a No
Deal Brexit. The spoon has to be politics as we once
knew
it, democracy
as we once knew it.
The
first spoon that will be bent is an independent media that asks
critical questions based on facts. As William Davies and others have
observed,
Johnson’s first leadership press conference was positively
Trumpian. Journalists who ask tough questions were
booed. Later
pressure
will
be
brought through the Tory media or elsewhere such that journalists
quickly learn that asking such questions is more trouble than it is
worth. Small outposts of critical thought may remain, because you
only need to control what most people see and read to bend the spoon
to your will. Whereas Trump plays the media through his tweets,
Johnson can shrug off using racist imagery about Muslim women by
offering
the MSM cups of tea.
The
spoon may become the judiciary, that has already raised the wrath of
parts of the governing party, its press and its members by daring to
allow parliament the final say in enacting Article 50. The
already unprecedented number of attacks by politicians on the civil
service will
morph into a politicisation of the civil service that Thatcher would
never
have dreamed of.
And
very soon the spoon may be parliament itself. Johnson is committed to
imposing the most devastating
kind of Brexit on the UK if he cannot get a deal by October, and
parliament may well try to stop him. Johnson has
not ruled
out ignoring
or
suspending parliament
and going
ahead anyway. If his poll numbers are not as favourable as some hope,
or
the deal he offers Farage is rejected, he
may be tempted to bypass
parliament rather
than call an election.
The
spoon that Johnson and his party want to bend or to
pretend
doesn’t exist is pluralist democracy itself. It will happen slowly,
each
stage seemingly
not so bad because each happens
with a joke and a smile. We can only hope that just because most
Conservative members want to live in a world where there is no spoon,
enough voters prefer changing the real
world
in
ways that enhance rather than diminish our democracy.
"A hard border is incompatible with the Good Friday Agreement"
ReplyDeleteThis is false. The GFA doesn't confer any right to avoid border checks, which is why they still exist e.g. for diesel smuggling and non-EU immigration (meaning even British and Irish citizens can be asked for ID to prove they are).
The GFA reserves powers over migration, tariffs, customs, etc to the UK and Irish governments, and doesn't allow the cross-border bodies to deal with them, because the all-Ireland bodies can only deal with devolved matters.
If by "incompatible" you do not actually mean "violates", then you must think a border in the Irish Sea would also violate the GFA. It doesn't.
If you think so, state the provisions of the GFA which are violated, and who told you so!
If you've been telling people that expansionary austerity is real for the last decade, and if you voted for the Iraq War as Cameron, Osborne, May, Hammond, Johnson, Redwood, Davis, Fox, and Cash did, then...
ReplyDeleteOur Blogger Simon Wren-Lewis (SWL) writes
ReplyDelete“The already unprecedented number of attacks by politicians on the civil service will morph into a politicisation of the civil service.”
In response to a comment I made on his blog of Jan 21 SWL wrote
“Osborne is a Tory. Are you surprised he encouraged the Treasury to produce a 'just recession' forecast?”
We are talking here of a key economic document issued in advance of one of the most important votes in this country. Why is SWL concerned about future politicisation if he feels that it has already happened in this case? Could it be that he is not concerned about politicisation itself rather he is only concerned about the direction of any politicisation?
The best way to prevent the politicisation of the Civil Service is to hold it to account. The HM Treasury Report on the immediate economic impact of leaving the EU predicted that after a Leave vote unemployment would increase by between 500,000 and 800,000. In practice we now have record employment. Unemployment is important in this context. People are happy to make their own judgement on any predictions of reduced economic growth rate since they will be affected as much as anyone else. But voters who were undecided would be dissuaded from voting Leave if they felt that it could cause other people to lose their livelihood. We will never know how many marginal voters were influenced by the erroneous predictions of job losses or what the outcome of the referendum what had been had the Treasury correctly predicted a favourable prospect for short term employment prospects.
Contrary to the assertion by SWL, there has been insufficient rather than too much criticism of the Treasury. Their main excuse is that had they hadn’t anticipated the delay of Article 50. But this explanation is not credible. There is no evidence that they would have predicted record employment had they known of the delay in advance and we now know from current conditions that the outcome for employment would have been much the same had the delay not occurred.
The Treasury report states that their document provides “a comprehensive, rigorous and objective analysis of the immediate impact of a vote to leave”. But the document is clearly not objective. It considers two scenarios but it states that the outcome could be worse; nowhere does it state that the outcome could be better, which in fact it was. Like the Iraq report before it, the document has clearly been ‘sexed up’, but unlike the Iraq report, this document has not been subject to subsequent public scrutiny. Unless the Treasury are made fully accountable in this case, then further politicisation is inevitable.